The Murder of Sigurd Sharon (Harriette Ashbrook)


Cecily Thane was an orthodox Vancian investigation; Steven Kester was a country house mystery. In her third mystery, Ashbrook tries the ‘hero walks into enigmatic situation’. Spike Tracy’s car breaks down in Vermont; high-spirited Jill takes him home to meet her family, whom she believes are trying to kill her; and that night Tracy discovers the dead body of her hated guardian, Methodist preacher Sigurd Sharon.

Well, this is rather brilliant: deceptively straightforward, with hyperingenuity in spades and a lethal trap for the smug. Sigurd Sharon is one of the earliest American detective stories to play with abnormal psychology, a genre in which Helens McCloy and Eustis would later produce classics. The modern reader (as both J.F. Norris and TomCat warned) will probably work out what’s going on – but it must have made readers in 1933 reel. The solution is as deft as the finest of Ashbrook’s American contemporaries, and finely clued, to boot – followed by a justifiable unofficial execution (unlike, say, Halter‘s Tête du tigre). Gur zbqrea ernqre jvyy pbzcynpragyl guvax “Evtug, vg’f boivbhfyl fcyvg crefbanyvgl; gung’f Nfuoebbx’f ovt fhecevfr” (cnegvphyneyl vs ur ybbxf hc n gvgyr va Qnavfu) – naq gura or ragveryl gnxra bss thneq jura Nfuoebbx erirnyf n frpbaq frperg, yvxr n frg bs onohfuxn qbyyf. Vg’f abg whfg vatravbhf, gubhtu; jr’er nyybjrq gb srry dhnyzf nobhg Wvyy’f sngr.

Ashbrook’s first two mysteries were entertaining; this is stunning. And it’s short and fast-paced enough to read in a single sitting. Pity this wasn’t filmed; Hitchcock could have had a lovely time with it.


Blurb

1933 Coward McCann

Source: Facsimile Dust Jackets LLC

“Yes, I got your number all right –

“You’re the sort of young fellah that goes around nosing into affairs that ain’t no concern of yours, butting in where you ain’t wanted, minding other folks’ business instead of minding your own, and in the end turning up with the right answer, which don’t add none to your popularity with certain parties I could mention.”

Not an altogether flattering portrait, these homely, irate words of Sheriff Silcox, but they do convey a picture of Spike Tracy, that insouciant young man who takes crime so light-heartedly, yet who somehow manages to baffle the professionals just as all good detective story detectives should.

He did it in The Murder of Cecily Thane, and in The Murder of Steven Kester, and he does it again in The Murder of Sigurd Sharon. There didn’t really seem to be much reason why anyone should kill Sigurd Sharon. He was old and weak and he was going to die in a few months anyway. Futile business, on the face of it, but closer acquaintance with the two girls who lived in the house with him brought to light all kinds of dirty work. Mary was lovely and tragic. Jill was lovely and comic – at times. At other times it was hard to classify her – angel or devil. Beside the secret which these two girls harboured between them, murder seemed simple. We will wager that never in all the pages of detective fiction have you found a story as strange and unbelievable, yet at the same time so unquestionably true to life as this story of the blight that lay over the lives of these two girls, and how it figured in –

THE MURDER OF SIGURD SHARON

7 thoughts on “The Murder of Sigurd Sharon (Harriette Ashbrook)

  1. I knew you would like it! You can see now why I called Ashbrook the link between Van Dine and Queen, which is not evident in Cecily Thane and Steven Kester. I suspect Ashbrook’s 1930s novels (after Steven Kester) were a good decade ahead of their time and probably contributed to her rapid decent into obscurity. Do you know of any mystery novels from the thirties comparable to Sigurd Sharon? The plot has since been run into the ground, but it must have astonished even the most fervent mystery readers when it was first published. And it probably didn’t help that she died relatively young.

    Anyway, I look forward to your other reviews!

    Like

  2. I loved this book. The frankly sexual themes are just as original as her plot twists. I practically applauded at the solution. A real unknown classic here. Thanks for giving all this attention to Harriet. To be honest this is my favorite of her books. Who cares if I figured it all out! I hope you read her Susannah Shane books. Two of them are fantastic.

    Like

  3. I have read this book. I agree that it is very good and worth reading. However, I would rate it as only 4 stars, because the major point became obvious to me early on. (V sbhaq vg fgenatr gung Wvyy naq Znel jrer arire frra gbtrgure. Naq jura Wvyy inavfurq sebz n thneqrq ubhfr, V orpnzr fher gung Wvyy naq Znel jrer bar crefba.)

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s